Copyright 2007 Cockatiel Foundation, Inc.
Cockatiel Foundation, Inc.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Join now to read the Cockatiel Chronicle! |
| Click on each Chronicle for full descriptions |
| Legislation Affects All of Us ... |
| NANDAY CONURES WILL NOT BE BANNED! Your letters worked! Thank you to all who wrote! |
| AFA Legislative Vice President Genny Wall just emailed the AFA Board of Directors with the good news. As stated, please cross-post! Thank you to everyone who wrote in and sent letters to help. All aviculturists must unite in our fight to save the avicultural species we work with. If any legislation were to prevent ownership of cockatiels, you would want other bird owners to help you. Please keep alert in your respective states for ongoing legislation! |
Letter from AFA Legislative Vice President Genny Wall:
Cross posting requested.
I have just received a call from Kristy Garcia of The Coalition of Pennsylvania Aviculturists (TOCPA), and Kelly Williams of the American
Federation of Aviculture (AFA), who, together with Rick Rowland of TOCPA, attended all sessions of the Pennsylvania Game Commission to
advocate for the rights of bird owners to own and keep their Nanday Conures and other exotic birds in Pennsylvania.
Kristy and Kelly asked me to relay the good news that Nanday Conures have been removed from the proposal to amend 58 PA Code Section
137.1.
This means that Nanday Conures WILL NOT BE BANNED IN PENNSYLVANIA.
Kristy, Rick, and Kelly will have more information later today or tomorrow when they issue their full report to us. Right now they are on their way
home, and will be taking a well-deserved rest from their three days of advocating for you and your birds.
Kelly wanted us to know that the Commissioners thanked them and all who appeared at the hearing, for their politeness, organization,
professionalism, and thoroughness in addressing the Commission. They said that it is obvious that we all love our birds and they were
impressed that so many people took the time to come before the Commission and advocate for them.
I want to personally say THANK YOU to Kristy, Kelly, and Rick, and everyone who called, faxed, wrote, emailed, and attended the hearing. Each
person who got involved played an important part in this victory for bird owners and our birds. Without your help the Nanday Conure would have
been banned in Pennsylvania. With your help we were able to show the Commission that a ban of this bird was not necessary either to protect
human health or wildlife habitat.
I hope that each of you who responded this time will view this victory as a learning experience, and that you will continue to respond when we
ask for help fighting other restrictive animal proposals that come up in other areas.
Thank you again.
Genny Wall
AFA Legislative VP
gennygem2@aol.com
www.afabirds.org
The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness. They recognized the significance of man's
spiritual nature, of his feelings and of his intellect. They knew that only a part of the pain, pleasure and satisfactions of life are to be found in
material things. They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against
the government, the right to be let alone - the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men. To protect that right, every
unjustifiable intrusion by the government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the
Fourth Amendment. And the use, as evidence in a criminal proceeding, of facts ascertained by such intrusion must be deemed a violation of the
Fifth.
--Justice Louis Brandeis OLMSTEAD v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438 (1928)
I have just received a call from Kristy Garcia of The Coalition of Pennsylvania Aviculturists (TOCPA), and Kelly Williams of the American
Federation of Aviculture (AFA), who, together with Rick Rowland of TOCPA, attended all sessions of the Pennsylvania Game Commission to
advocate for the rights of bird owners to own and keep their Nanday Conures and other exotic birds in Pennsylvania.
Kristy and Kelly asked me to relay the good news that Nanday Conures have been removed from the proposal to amend 58 PA Code Section
137.1.
This means that Nanday Conures WILL NOT BE BANNED IN PENNSYLVANIA.
Kristy, Rick, and Kelly will have more information later today or tomorrow when they issue their full report to us. Right now they are on their way
home, and will be taking a well-deserved rest from their three days of advocating for you and your birds.
Kelly wanted us to know that the Commissioners thanked them and all who appeared at the hearing, for their politeness, organization,
professionalism, and thoroughness in addressing the Commission. They said that it is obvious that we all love our birds and they were
impressed that so many people took the time to come before the Commission and advocate for them.
I want to personally say THANK YOU to Kristy, Kelly, and Rick, and everyone who called, faxed, wrote, emailed, and attended the hearing. Each
person who got involved played an important part in this victory for bird owners and our birds. Without your help the Nanday Conure would have
been banned in Pennsylvania. With your help we were able to show the Commission that a ban of this bird was not necessary either to protect
human health or wildlife habitat.
I hope that each of you who responded this time will view this victory as a learning experience, and that you will continue to respond when we
ask for help fighting other restrictive animal proposals that come up in other areas.
Thank you again.
Genny Wall
AFA Legislative VP
gennygem2@aol.com
www.afabirds.org
The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness. They recognized the significance of man's
spiritual nature, of his feelings and of his intellect. They knew that only a part of the pain, pleasure and satisfactions of life are to be found in
material things. They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against
the government, the right to be let alone - the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men. To protect that right, every
unjustifiable intrusion by the government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the
Fourth Amendment. And the use, as evidence in a criminal proceeding, of facts ascertained by such intrusion must be deemed a violation of the
Fifth.
--Justice Louis Brandeis OLMSTEAD v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438 (1928)
